mirror of
https://codeberg.org/grunfink/snac2.git
synced 2024-11-25 22:45:05 +00:00
Updated TODO.
This commit is contained in:
parent
70d1cf784a
commit
70901fa168
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
4
TODO.md
4
TODO.md
|
@ -24,8 +24,6 @@ Implement hashtags. They are not very useful, as they can only be implemented as
|
|||
|
||||
Implement bulleted lists. Mastodon is crap and won't show them, but other implementations (Friendica, Pleroma) will do.
|
||||
|
||||
Idea for a new disk layout: timelines stored like in git (2 character directories and then the md5.json inside); one append-only index with entry ids, read backwards (easy because md5 binary ids have a constant size); children lists as append-only files stored inside the timeline directories with almost the same names as the parent entry; liked-by and announced-by lists as append-only files of actor ids. No _snac metadata inside the message (But, what about the referrer? With this layout, do I need it?). The instance storage may even be global, not per user; this could help in very big instances (but will this be a use-case for snac? not probably).
|
||||
|
||||
## Closed
|
||||
|
||||
Start a TODO file (2022-08-25T10:07:44+0200).
|
||||
|
@ -185,3 +183,5 @@ Add a switch for sensitive posts (2022-11-16T12:17:50+0100).
|
|||
Add an RSS to the local timeline (2022-11-18T11:43:54+0100).
|
||||
|
||||
Dropping on input those messages that have their parent hidden is not a good idea, as children of *these* dropped messages will pass unharmed (2022-11-28T11:34:56+0100).
|
||||
|
||||
Idea for a new disk layout: timelines stored like in git (2 character directories and then the md5.json inside); one append-only index with entry ids, read backwards (easy because md5 binary ids have a constant size); children lists as append-only files stored inside the timeline directories with almost the same names as the parent entry; liked-by and announced-by lists as append-only files of actor ids. No _snac metadata inside the message (But, what about the referrer? With this layout, do I need it?). The instance storage may even be global, not per user; this could help in very big instances (but will this be a use-case for snac? not probably) (2022-12-04T06:49:55+0100).
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue